To A Utilitarian, This Would Not Apply As They Are Not

To a Utilitarian, this would not apply as they are not bound by the holy scripture, the divine command, they would view this as, it’s their own decision to decide what to do with their own body, no government, no authority or any other person can interfere on what their right is. It is their own absolute autonomy to make their own decision, whether they choose to die. Jeremy Bentham associates utilitarianism with ancient hedonism, where actions are resulting in the pursuit of happiness. It was him who established â€Å"act† utilitarian; where the decisions deal with each individual case analyzing the benefits and harm to promote to overall happiness, which would yield the best consequences. Every action and every decision would be weighted for†¦show more content†¦This would achieve the best health care system for the society; since we would be saving all the patients coming through the emergency room. Also, some patients feel hopeless when the clinicians are making their decisions for them, however, when clinicians are dealing with competent, rational patients, patients can take part of the decision making on their own treatment, the dilemma happens when the patient is not rational, incompetent, like a patient without an advanced directive for healthcare and being in a persistent vegetative state, or coma and unable to make their own decisions. An advantage to a utilitarian theory would be; if a terminal ill person wanted to die, and family members did not object to the person wanting to die, then the Mercy killing would be viewed as acceptable. Similarly, utilitarian’s are not bound to the holy scripture, so the command, â€Å"Though shall not kill†, also has no effect on what is morally right or what is morally wrong for a utilitarian person wanting to die, so if they majority of the family are okay with the person wanting to die by voluntary euthanasia, then it would be viewed as acceptable. However, the disadvantage to this would be, what about the minority? Being utilitarian, and being a minority would not be in your favor, because the majority would always win. What if your Grandma, who is suffering from a terminal illness,Show MoreRelatedUtilitarianism : The And Influential Moral Theories890 Words   |  4 PagesThe basis of act utilitarianism is maximizing utility, that is, doing the things that maxim ize happiness over suffering. Utilitarians reject moral codes that are based on customs or traditions given by leaders or supernatural deities because they judge the truth or justifiability of morality as its positive contribution to all beings. Both act utilitarians and rule utilitarians concur that the overall aim in determining the morality of our actions should be to create the best possible results, butRead MoreEssay about Using Utilitarianism to Address Abortion1286 Words   |  6 PagesIn this paper, I will be defining act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism, use both standpoints from a rule utilitarian and an act utilitarian to decipher their responses to abortion, and investigate both claims to come to a conclusion if or if not utilitarianism is adequate enough argument to address abortion. First the definition of utilitarianism is, â€Å"An act is morally right if and only if it does more to improve overall happiness than any available alternative† (Farley). Overall happinessRead MoreThe Article Ethical Reasoning : Implications For Accounting875 Words   |  4 Pagesegoists are tend to focus on themselves, utilitarians try to maximize the net benefit for society as a whole. Utilitarians analyze the advantages and disadvantages of each decision and all possible outcomes. Then, utilitarians decide based on which decision provides the best net outcome.There are two types of utilitarians: act-utilitarians and rule-utilitarians. The difference between the two groups is the limits of how they can make decisions. Act-utilitarians focus on the specific act that will provideRead MoreUtilitarianism : A Ethical Theory1381 Words   |  6 Pagesmaximizes utility, or produces the largest amount of good. Utilitarians define good as pleasure or happiness, since it is the on ly thing that is intrinsically good. This is not to say that utilitarians deny that there are other goods, but that those goods, such as friends, food, and romance, are merely a means to to producing pleasure. However, pleasure is good in itself because it does not aim to produce some further good. The utilitarian process can be used in account of both the self’s well-beingRead MoreUtilitarianism And The Most Important Argument1679 Words   |  7 PagesIn this essay, I will be writing about utilitarianism and the most important notion that arises from it, which is that an action is morally right only if it maximizes the greatest good for the greatest number of people (Cahn, 114). First, I will explain what utilitarianism is, when and by whom it was originally created, and a brief explanation of what it stands for. I will then explain the two different types of classical utilitarianism and explain the differences between the two. Next, I will giveRead MoreEthical Decision Making990 Words   |  4 PagesThomas 01/22/2012 Abstract Ethics is the branch of philosophy that examines questions of morality, or right and wrong. In this paper we will discuss the philosophical approaches used in ethical decision making. The two approaches that will be elaborated on are the utilitarian approach and the universal approach. Several questions will be addressed, (1) what is the utilitarian and universal approach? (2) How do we use them in the ethical decision making process and (3) examples of how it relate inRead MoreEssay about Kantian vs Utilitarian Ethical Parameters990 Words   |  4 Pagesstands before me in this paper is to address two situations and determine the ethical parameters in which a person should act. The two philosophical approaches that I will examine the situations with the Kantian and Utilitarian point of view. Kant deciphers his ethical questions by examining a persons motivation for performing an act regardless of the consequences. A person who utilizes the Kantian view believes that the only pure good is pure human reason without consequences. This pure human reasonRead MoreIn Famine, Affluence, And Morality, Peter Singer Argues1553 Words   |  7 PagesIn Famine, Affluence, and Morality, Peter Singer argues for the utilitarian system of ethics. To thoroughly understand this system, one must first accept the notion that the individual has a moral obligation to prevent something bad from happening if it is in their power to do so. For Singer, there is no inherently good moral compass one must strictly abide by. Actions that are considered good or bad differ based on the situation in question. Contrarily, Immanuel Kant asserts that there is intrinsicRead MoreCase Study : Applications Of Utilitarianism1339 Words   |  6 Pageschose to apply utilitarianism to is case number three. In cas e three, I am working for the number one car manufacturer in the country. Our latest model the Hipster is planned to be released but has potential brake issues. These brake malfunctions could cause serious injuries from accidents due to drivers being unable to stop the vehicle. The requirement is to submit a report and let consumers know that there is a recall after the government department approves the recall. However, this recall willRead MoreEssay on Bernard Williams and Utilitarianism690 Words   |  3 PagesThe utilitarian faces many problems because he loses any ability to live a personal life. By this is meant that in making decisions the utilitarian must consider the steps which lead to the highest level of goodness in society. The utilitarian reaches for the greatest good for the greatest number of people. Two main aspects dominate the light of utilitarian beliefs. The consequentialist principle explains that in determining the rightness or wrongness of an act one must e xamine the results that will